AI agents under fire: what does this mean for your organization?

Begin 2026 publiceerde OWASP (Open Worldwide Application Security Project) hun bijgewerkte Top 10 risico’s voor Large Language Model-toepassingen, waarin AI-agents als een van de snelst groeiende aanvalsvectoren worden aangemerkt. Het rapport laat zien dat cybercriminelen zich in toenemende mate richten op AI-agents om vertrouwelijke informatie uit organisatiesystemen los te krijgen.

Steeds meer organisaties gebruiken AI-agents voor het ophalen en analyseren van documenten, communicatie met API’s en het uitvoeren van geautomatiseerde processen. Die brede toegang maakt AI-agents een aantrekkelijk doelwit. In tegenstelling tot traditionele taalmodellen kunnen deze agents zelfstandig externe tools en databronnen benaderen, wat het risico op misbruik vergroot.

This underscores a conclusion we at EasyData al langer trekken: anyone deploying AI agents for business-critical processes must think about where those agents run and who has access. Local AI agents offer better protection than cloud-based alternatives.

OWASP Top 10 LLM-risico’s

Prompt injection
Targeted prompts that manipulate agents
Systeemprompt manipulatie
Internal instructions are bypassed
Sociale manipulatie + techniek
Combination of attack methods
Local AI as solution
Kleiner aanvalsoppervlak, volledige controle
EasyData expertise
25+ jaar lokale documentverwerking

How attackers exploit AI agents, and how local AI protects

OWASP identifies two main methods. With local AI agents both are significantly harder to execute.

Groeiend risico

Prompt Injection aanvallen

Targeted prompts that manipulate agents

  • Attackers send targeted prompts to AI agents
  • Agents are convinced to release data
  • With cloud AI attacks occur via the internet
  • Every API call travels over unmanaged networks
Local solution: no internet exposure

All traffic stays within your own infrastructure, significantly reducing the attack surface.

Hoog risico

Systeemprompt manipulatie

Internal instructions are bypassed

  • Aanvallers richten zich op interne AI-instructies
  • Agents are induced to assume a different role
  • Confidential information is released
  • AI environments not integrated in security policy
Lokale oplossing: volledige controle

Manage system prompts yourself and physically shield them within your own security perimeter.

Cybersecurity als metafoor voor beveiligde lokale AI-agents

Waarom lokale AI betere bescherming biedt

With cloud-based AI agents all interactions occur via the internet. Every API call travels over networks you do not control. With a local AI agent all traffic stays within your own infrastructure, leaving attackers no external access point.

Additionally, with cloud solutions your data by definition leaves the organization. With local AI you determine the encryption level, key storage and access rights yourself. You integrate the AI agent into your own security framework.

OWASP concludes that organizations must set clear boundaries on what agents may access. That is exactly what local implementation enables, with TLS 1.3-encryptie, CIS Hardening en ISO 27001-richtlijnen as foundation.

Eight reasons why local AI agents are safer

🔒

No internet exposure

Your AI agent communicates only within your own network.

Without internet connection, prompt injection via external channels is not possible.More about data sovereignty
🛡

Kleiner aanvalsoppervlak

Minder externe koppelingen, minder kwetsbaarheden.

Locally you restrict access to what is strictly necessary.ISO 27001-aanpak
📋

Volledige audit trail

Every action of your AI agent can be monitored and logged locally.

With cloud AI you depend on the logs the provider shares. Locally you have full visibility.Monitoring with Grafana

Eigen beveiligingsbeleid

Jij bepaalt de regels: welke data de agent mag benaderen.

Integrate your AI agent into existing security policy with firewall rules and encryption.CIS Hardening
🇪🇺

AVG-compliance versterkt

Process personal data within the EU, without American cloud providers.

Simplifies your DPIA and minimizes data processing agreements.AVG quickscan
🔐

System prompts under control

You manage the internal instructions, not an external party.

Attackers increasingly manipulate system prompts. Locally you manage these entirely yourself.
🚀

No vendor lock-in

Choose your own AI models and switch without dependency.

Open-source modellen en lokale infrastructuur geven digitale onafhankelijkheid.Cloud vs on-premise
0
+ jaar
Ervaring in documentautomatisering
0
uur
Time zone difference with Armenian team
NL
datacenters
Verwerking in Europese infrastructuur
AVG
compliant
Registered under FG001914

How EasyData implements local AI agents

At EasyData we have been building for over 25 years on intelligente documentverwerking. Our AI agents run by default within the client’s infrastructure or in our own European data center. That is not a marketing choice, but a deliberate architectural decision.

Our approach combines verantwoord AI-gebruik with strict security measures. We apply TLS 1.3-encryptie , work according to ISO 27001-richtlijnen en implementeren CIS Hardening. Every AI agent only gets access to the data strictly necessary for the specific task.

Where cloud-based AI agents depend on the measures of an external provider, we integrate AI security into the broader cybersecurity policy of your organization. That means the same firewall rules, access control and monitoring as your other business-critical systems.

Databeveiliging bij AI-toepassingen door EasyData

In 5 steps to a secure local AI agent

1

Assessment

We analyze your current document processes and determine where AI agents add value.

We brengen datastromen, systeemkoppelingen en beveiligingsrisico’s in kaart.Assessment aanvragen
2

Architectuur

We design a secured architecture with local AI models.

Network isolation, encryption and role-based access control, fitting in your existing IT landscape.
3

Implementatie

We install the AI agent within your own infrastructure or our European data center.

Configuration of all security layers and integration with existing systems.Nederlands datacenter
4

Testing en hardening

We testen op prompt injection, systeemprompt-manipulatie en andere aanvalsvectoren.

Penetratietests op prompt injection, data-exfiltratie en privilege escalation.CIS Hardening
5

Monitoring en support

Continue monitoring, audit logging en ondersteuning.

Monitoring op afwijkend gedrag, automatische audit trails en proactieve ondersteuning.Grafana monitoring